We Care About Your Privacy
By clicking “Accept all”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy.
The term 21st Century skills is becoming significantly part of the classroom learning environment, but what exactly does that mean? There are a few definitions, however, in essence, these are the skills that our learners need to prepare them for their future (Puchta & Williams, 2014), taking them from their studies, to their futures as adults.
Many researchers today acknowledge the 4C’s. They are known as:
(New Vision for Education, 2016)
How can we integrate these skills into teaching EAL learners? It’s highly likely you already engage your learners in using many of these skills, although you may not be consciously aware of this. By defining these skills, we can consider how to apply them in our classroom.
Critical thinking skills are defined by how a learner can shift their lower-order thinking skills to higher order thinking skills. Blooms Taxonomy’s grid provides a good model to demonstrate this (Bloom, 1956 & Clarke, 2001).
Critical thinking skills allow the learners to process information in a variety of different ways. The rationale for teaching thinking skills with the teaching of language is outlined by Puchta & WIlliams (2014). There is a danger of removing any intellectual challenge, in order to become more linguistically comprehensible. Learners can become disenchanted by over-simple activities designed for the learner's linguistic level as opposed to their cognitive potential, which then fails to provide challenge.
Communication skills are defined by learners working together and improving their receptive and productive language skills; for example, materials designed for EAL learners involve learners using the target language in order to communicate a piece of information to another learner, allowing the language to be meaningful (Puchta & Williams 2014).
A communicative approach allows learners to complete a task with a real purpose, that is non-linguistic, for example, to invent something, to solve a problem, or to conduct an experiment. Language becomes the medium for the learners to complete the task. It is the teacher’s role to help the learners with the appropriate language in order to achieve this.
Creativity skills are defined by tasks that provide learners with the freedom to use whatever language they have at their disposal to get their message across (Nunan, 2011). These can be closely associated with Bloom’s Taxonomy. This will allow learners to make new connections and share their knowledge in a variety of different ways. In creative tasks, learners are required to use their initiative, and are given opportunities to use target language for meaningful purposes with attention on the message and the tasks they are completing, rather than correctness of form and structure (Nunan, 2011).
An example of creative tasks could be where learners have to bridge an information gap or perform a 'spot the difference task. In addition, a writing journal, where learners are given the freedom to write as they please, can also provide a useful tool for creativity.
Finally, collaboration skills are defined by the ability to work with others. This is excellent for reinforcing newly learned vocabulary and grammar. Scott (2012) explains that learning is a social process, therefore, when collaborating, learners should be encouraged to interact in one of the following ways: through the teacher conversing with the learners, through a whole-class discussion, through a small-group discussion and by means of peer-to-peer discussions.
When the group engages in collaborative learning, all four skills can be fostered. Group work can promote both content learning (Kagan & McGroarty, 1993) and language acquisition (Mackey & Gass, 2006).
The OUP (2013) has identified 5 strategies that encompass using these skills for the future. They are as follows:
Adapted from OUP ELT Global Blog
By incorporating these 21st century skills into our classrooms we are able to provide our learners with opportunities for them to listen, speak, read and write in ways that are meaningful and intrinsically motivated. Attached is a resource with some ideas for teaching these skills.
References:
ELT, Oxford University Press. “5 Ways to Prepare Your Students for the 21st Century.” Oxford University Press, 9 Oct. 2013, Click here.
Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking Formative Assessment: Practical Strategies for Enhancing Pupils’ Learning in the Primary Classroom, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Kagan, S., & McGroarty, M. (1993). Principles of cooperative learning for language and content gains. In D. D. Holt (Ed.), Cooperative learning (pp.47–66). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Introduction to special issue on new methods of studying L2 acquisition in interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 169–178.
Nunan. D (2011). Teaching English to Young Learners, Anaheim University Press, Anaheim California.
Puchta, H, and Williams, M (2014). Teaching Young Learners to Think ELT-Activities for Young Learners Aged 6 -12. Helbling
Scahfersman, S, D (1991) An Introduction to Critical Thinking Faculty Available at: Click here.
Scott, C (2012). Teaching English as an Additional Language, 5-11: A Whole School Resource File. London: Routledge
Vygotsky, L (1980). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press
World Economic Forum (2016), New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology, Click here accesses 23/2/18 Geneva
In the last edition, we considered the importance of not using a Whole Language approach in isolation as a primary method of literacy instruction, but rather ensuring that a systematic, skills-based approach is used to guarantee reading and writing progression for second language learners. This begs the question, which systematic approach should we use? The two systematic methods adopted by most practitioners for first language learners are the Analytical or Analytic Phonics approach or the Synthetic Phonics approach.
Learners may have difficulties expressing their own ideas, thoughts and feelings.
Tip or Idea: Name the emotions. Use puppets, flashcards or simply hide and uncover your own face. Who can be first to name the emotion? Extend by giving a reason why e.g. He is happy because…
Learning Village resource: Feelings Snakes & Ladders game - land on a picture. Describe it and move forward 1 space! (I am happy when…/I am sad when…/I am shocked when…)
Whilst reading a book on reclaiming childhood ('Their name is today' by Johann Christoph Arnold) the chapter on 'learning differences and how to cater for them' triggered thoughts on teaching differences. At the end of the October article it was mentioned that EAL teaching should be evaluated in a different way due to the very nature of the subject and I shall try to clarify why.